Live-Online and In-Person Instruction — Math
Math Difficulties
The following comparative growth analysis shows statistically significant mean gains for Lindamood-Bell sensory-cognitive in-person and live-online students from 2017 to 2025, including all students who received instruction during the pandemic.
This analysis includes students who received instruction for math.
The gains of students who have received live-online instruction are comparable in growth to those of in-person students. The standard score gains for both populations are large.
Math pre-/post- data for in-person and live-online instruction includes data from 2017 through September 2025.
Other than vocabulary, both populations achieved medium to large standard score gains (three of four measures). In general, both live-online and in-person students tested statistically significantly higher on post-instruction on all measures.
Results from an ANOVA statistical test of comparative significance (p<.05) indicate that all measures were comparable in growth between the two populations.
Summary
Lindamood-Bell
Instruction Implemented:
On Cloud Nine
Years:
2017 – August 2025
Number of Students:
In-Person Students n=132
Live-Online Students n=44
Average Age:
In-Person Students: 10.2
Live-Online Students: 11.1
Average Instruction Hours:
In-Person Students: 81.2
Live-Online Students: 90.6
